按份共有

我国民事立法中的按份共有人优先购买权便是其中之一。

Co-owner by shares in PRC Civil Law is one example .

第四部分：按份共有人优先购买权的法律救济。

The legal remedy of co-owners by shares ' pre-emptive rights .

基于独立的所有权，原则上各按份共有人可以对其应有份自由的处分。

Based on independent ownership , in principle , all owners can freely dispose their due shares .

对按份共有人处分行为的阐述仅限于教材式的简单介绍，缺乏系统的研究。

The elaboration of this act is merely limited to textbook-style introduction , devoid of systematic study .

共有分为按份共有和共同共有。

There shall be two kinds of joint ownership , namely co-ownership by shares and common ownership .

可以说，按份共有人的处分行为是按份共有人所有权权能中最重要的一种表现形式。

It can be claimed that the disposition of co-owners by shares is the most important manifestation in ownership function .

依据物权法的规定共有分为共同共有与按份共有两种基本类型，我国大多数学者均认同上述划分。

According to the provisions of the law , joint ownership and several co-ownership are two basic types of co-ownership .

大陆法上有应有份额的概念，这一概念使用于按份共有之中。

In the Civil Law System , there is the concept of quota , which is used in the communion by severalty .

深化了按份共有人处分行为的理论认识，完善了按份共有人处分行为的实践操作。

It has deepened theoretical understanding of the disposition of co-owners by shares , and improved the practice for the disposition of co-owners .

探讨了《物权法建议稿》取消共同共有而代之为份额相等的按份共有，这一规定对于船舶抵押权以及他物权的设定的影响。

The third one is that Suggestion of Real Law cancels the " joint coownership ", and the effect resulting from this change .

按份共有人的处分行为是指按份共有人对其共有财产的价值以及实物，变更所有权或者限定所有权的行为。

The disposition of co-owners by shares is the act that co-owners change or limit the ownership of their mutual property value and entity .

我国法律规定了按份共有人间的优先购买权，但对于各按份共有人间如何行使该权利未予明确。

Our country law stipulates the preemption right of the share co-ownership parties , but it is not clear to how to exercise this right .

共同共有与按份共有存在共同点，认识这些共同点有助于更好地理解共同共有与按份共有的本质区别，把握共同共有的独立性。

Knowing these similar aspects helps to better understand the material difference between joint ownership and several co-ownership and better understand the independence of joint ownership further .

指两个或两个以上的权利主体对同一财产共同享有所有权。共有又分共同共有和按份共有。

The common owners preemptive right is not stipulated in the Law of Property , but when the relationship of common ownership vanishes , it is safer to vest the ot .

通说主张，共有分为按份共有和共同共有两种类型，它们分别根源于罗马法上的共有和日耳曼法上的共有。

Generally speaking , the co-ownership is always classified into tenancy in common and joint tenancy , they all can data back to the tenancy in roman law and germany law .

可以根据对共有财产的实物形态以及价值形态的不同利用，将按份共有人的处分行为划分按份共有人对共有物的处分和按份共有人对应有份的处分。

Based on the different use of physical form and value form of the mutual property , the disposition of co-owners by shares can be divided into their disposition of mutual property and due shares .

共有在物权法中是一个并不引人注意的课题，而且在众多的法学教科书中，学者都是对按份共有论述得多一些，而对共同共有论述得都较少。

In the property law joint ownership is a less interesting subject . In many legal textbooks , scholars give more attention to joint ownership by shares , and less to joint ownership in common .

按份共有房屋时，各共有人所有的房屋面积是明确的，承租人的先买权是平等享有的，可以由出卖人自己决定买受人的人选，以化繁为简。

The area of the mutual person owning is clear in the share co-ownership system , each lessee preemption right is equal , the seller can decide which person can buy this house by himself to change numerous for brief .

然而在具体的制度设计方而，出于配套规范的不完善，对其他按份共有人的权益缺乏有效的保护，易使其处于权益被侵犯却无处申诉的尴尬境地。

However , due to imperfect matching specification in terms of specific design of the system , there is a lack of effective protection of the rights and interests of co-owners by shares . They are vulnerable to violation and unable to appeal .

第二章、第三章介绍了共有权的两种最重要的分类一按份共有及共同共有，分析了按份共有及共同共有的概念特征，对典型的案例进行探讨。

Chapter II , Chapter III , introduced the right to a total of the two most important categories & tenancy in common and tenancy in entirety . Analyse the concept and the characteristics of tenancy in common and tenancy in entirety . Explore the tipical cases .

本文的第三部分分析了共有权的概念涵义、法律属性、客体范围及其行使的限制，并指出应该根据不同的建筑物区别是共同共有还是按份共有。

The third part of this article analyzes the meaning of the concept of co-ownership , legal attributes , scope and object of the exercise of the restrictions , and that the building should be based on the difference between the different joint tenancy or by shares .

然而在具体处分应有份时，要联系所有权行使的限制考察自由处分应有份的整体限制，联系按份共有人的优先购买权考察自由处分应有份的局部限制。

However , when disposing specific due shares , we should associate the restriction on ownership fulfillment and investigate the overall constraints on free disposition of due shares , and relate investigate the partial constraints on free disposition of due shares by relating to co-owners ' preemptive right .