joa

According to JOA method , the average improvement was 2 points .

根据JOA评分，平均提高2分。

According to JOA method , clinical syndrome were scored .

对临床症状进行JOA评分。

Clinical improvement rate of JOA score was 77.1 % .

临床JOA评分平均改善率77.1%。

The clinical improvement was judged by JOA score system .

对所有患者进行JOA评分并计算其改善率。

The clinical effects were analyzed according to JOA scoring criteria of lower back pain .

采用日本骨科学会（JOA）下腰痛评分标准评价其手术后疗效。

The JOA score were used to evaluate patient outcomes .

应用腰椎J0A评分评估患者的神经功能。

The improvement rates according to JOA scoring systerm were evaluated .

按照JOA评分标准判定其术后改善率。

Both groups of patients with lower VAS , JOA score , improved clinical signs .

两组均能降低患者的VAS、JOA评分，改善临床体征。

Objective and precise reliability of JOA scoring system for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

脊髓型颈椎病JOA指数的客观和精确信度调查

Comparing JOA scores before and after the operation , to comparing curative effect between different operative method .

通过比较其前、后路手术术前术后JOA评分，从而比较不同手术治疗的效果。

The JOA and ODI scoring methods were adopted to evaluate the clinical efficacy .

临床疗效评定采用JOA评估、ODI评分方法。

The JOA score of anterior approach is 8.83 point , for posterior approach is 8.25 point .

JOA评分前路为8.83分，后路为8.52分。

JOA score was used to evaluate the changes of the neurological function as well as the clinical outcome .

采用日本骨科学会（JOA）评分法评价神经功能的变化。

JOA score by summing up two-door operation posterior cervical cancer .

通过JOA评分总结颈椎后路双开门手术的临床疗效。

Results JOA recovery scores were excellent in 4 cases , good in 2 cases and median in 1 cases .

结果JOA评分优4例、良2例、中1例。

The score of all patients had improved 2 to 5 respectively according to the standard of ( JOA ) .

JOA骨髓功能评分分别提高2～5分。

The JOA for lower limb motor function and sphincter function were used to evaluate their neurological status respectively .

用JOA括约肌功能评分和下肢运动功能评分以及运动功能恢复率评估疗效。

The curative effects were assessed by JOA criteria for evaluating the effect on hip osteoarthritis .

以JOA髋关节骨关节炎的疗效评定标准进行疗效评定。

Curative effect evaluation results recovery rate ( JOA ) for 95.6 % , ODI relatively preoperative also improved obviously .

疗效评定结果恢复率（JOA）为95.6%，ODI较术前也明显改善。

The efficacy of the surgery was evaluated by JOA scoring for foot disorders .

并采用足部疾患治疗效果JOA评分并进行患足功能评分以评价其临床疗效。

Compared with group B , the JOA score of Groups A and Group C significantly increased ( P < 0.05 ) .

C组、A组的JOA评分与B组相比，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；

Neural function ( JOA score system ) and cervical MRI were evaluated at 3,6,12 and 24 months postoperatively .

于术后3、6、12、24个月，通过JOA评分、颈椎MRI检查评估疗效。

The JOA score were increased from 2 to 10 in the first postoperative month , 5.7 on average .

术后1个月内复查，JOA评分提高了2~10分，平均为5.7分。

The JOA score significantly improved after three months , and there is no statistical difference between the three groups ( P0.05 ) .

三组病人术后3个月JOA评分均有明显改善，无统计学差异（P0.05）。

After treatment the JOA score for comparative analysis , P0.05 , two groups of treatment effect in patients with no significant difference in the two groups .

将两组患者治疗后JOA评分进行比较分析，P0.05，两组患者疗效无明显差异，武当顺势整脊疗法可应用于腰椎间盘突出症的治疗，其疗效得到肯定。

According to the JOA criterion for spinal function , the improvement rates were 14.3 % to 100 % ( average 80 % ) .

临床神经症状按JOA脊髓损伤功能17分法评定标准，术后功能改善率为14.3%100%，平均为80%。

Results Compared with before the treatment , the JOA score of all the 3 groups increase markedly after the treatment ( P < 0.001 ) .

结果：A组、B组和C组治疗后JOA评分均较治疗前明显增加，差异有统计学意义（P<0.001）。

Logistic regression analysis showed that Preoperative leg pain VAS and preoperative JOA score were the statistically significant factors to the clinical results .

多因素回归分析提示，患者术前JOA评分及腿痛VAS评分对术后临床疗效有显著影响。

Short-term results were followed with neurologic evaluations using a scoring system proposed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association ( JOA score ) .

术后对近期结果随访，并按日本矫形外科协会（JOA）评分系统评分。

Before and after treatment were fill in improved low back pain score method ( JOA ) and visual simulation grading ( VAS ) evaluation method form .

治疗前后分别填写改良的下腰痛评分法（JOA）及视觉模拟定级（VAS）评定法表格。